![]() In terms of sound quality Amadeus could possibly be slightly better than Noteperformer, but for today's standards none of them are really realistic or believable. It's plug and play, you install it and it works by reading what you write, you don't have to craft a Rosetta stone for the notation software. This is a big advantage for NotePerformer. Those are either interpreted by Finale and sent to Amadeus, or most likely you have to tell Finale how to interpret all of that by creating a playback interpretation sort of thing, like the Sibelius SoundSets, letting Finale know where each articulation resides within the sample library. Amadeus does not read the notations, crescendos, dynamics, articulation changes, etc. Sorry, forgot to mention how it compares to Amadeus. The way I see it, it's a failsafe when you have a more traditional arrangement and a lifesaver when you are requested to arrange something in a more contemporary or avant-garde style. But it is very valuable for double checking your instincts when you are orchestrating under the gun and don't have time to go back and forth to the literature. It will not provide the answer for that 8-note divisi you want in your string section. It does not replace common sense or orchestration skill, though. ![]() ![]() I wouldn't presume to know what the intention behind Noteperformer originally is, but I can tell you what I use it for: Checking orchestrations and balances.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |